You would think it would make people smarter. In fact, the study is totally backwards. The internet has been liberalism's public enemy number 1 forever because everything they say since the 90's can't be challenged with a simple "nuh uh" anymore.
Now with Google when you do that liberals say, "Oh yeah? You and what army?"
And you can say, "This army of information on why "liberals suck" that is 3 million strong and arrived in .05 seconds."
You don't even need the internet to do the math there. Liberals love government, and the government gave us the post office, and they deliver .05 packages in 3 million seconds.
Now there are 3,000,001 ways that liberals suck.
Anyway there's that, and more from today's Newsbusted.
I actually knew about this before watching this video. Given liberal sanctimony over raising the debt ceiling, one of the greatest tragedies of this debate is what is said in this video wont get the play it deserves...
The second greatest tragedy is that I didn't get to see Juan Williams's full reaction. I don't any ever gets tired of seeing liberalism's intellectual bankruptcy on full display.
Liberals, if you're having trouble understanding what just happened, now is your chance to go find a fifth grader to help you translate it.
If that doesn't work and you still can't wash away the brain boogers you got from letting your mind sleep while listening to droning Democratic talking points your whole life, then you need to rewind, rinse, and repeat...until it's clean.
I think I need to rephrase the title of this post....
Finally! ne Liberal Who Agrees Raising The Debt Ceiling Is A Failure Of Leadership.
h/t iOwnTheWorld for the videoAdd a comment
Oh geez, here we go again....
The DCCC is sending out press releases in 50 Republican districts Thursday asking if they agree with Reagan on the debt ceiling....
“Ronald Reagan worked with [Democratic Speaker] Tip O’Neill and Democrats to cut spending, raise revenues and reform Social Security,” President Obama said Saturday in his weekly address. “That kind of cooperation should be the least you expect from us,” he added.
From Weasel Zippers
The reason we have this problem with liberalism is they have no understanding of themselves. Being forced to live in that prison of their own making causes them to be squishy on what it is they oppose and when they'll oppose it.
That's why we get nonsense like this from them. Isn't it amazing how liberals exalt things they hate in order to make people satisfy whatever blind partisan whim they have at any given moment?
Right now it's Ronald Reagan.
During budget cuts it's children. Even when the budget being cut is Planned Parenthood's.
With Michelle Obama it's vegetables.
It never really matters what comes out of their mouth, they'll say ANYTHING to win an argument. They even use Jesus.
Liberals deride Him as the "imaginary" friend of Christian conservatives, and then turn around and say He was a really a liberal. They "think" Jesus wouldn't vote for you Christian conservative believers seeking public office, he would vote for sexually "free," income mugging, infanticide proliferating moral equivocators who view power as the means to control people and remake the world into their image rather than trying to walk with Him. If that isn't enough they rest at nothing to have His presence removed from EVERYWHERE...especially His birthday.
These narcissists think Jesus Knows them.
The only thing shocking about their going there with Ronald Reagan is that it took them so freakin' long. It was only a generation ago that they were playing cute little games like pointing out the number of letters in Ronald Wilson Reagan came out to "666." Now the DCCC looks to him for salvation on the debt ceiling.
So, by their own estimation, does this mean liberals think their "anti-christ" can deliver them from taking responsibility for the government's debt? Where does that leave the self-proclaimed bond they share with Jesus?
I don't blame them for exploiting real, effective leaders of men, their dishonesty about their own identity prevents them from having any of their own.Add a comment
House Democrats lined up to excoriate GOP Rep. Allen West on Wednesday after he sent an incendiary email to the Democratic party chairwoman calling her "vile" and "not a lady."
I'm failing to see the problem....
Vile – adjective, vil·er, vil·est.
1. wretchedly bad: a vile humor.
2. highly offensive, unpleasant, or objectionable: vile slander.
3. repulsive or disgusting, as to the senses or feelings: a vile odor.
In math if you take a negative number and multiply it by another negative number, you get a positive number. Following that logic I'm surprised liberals haven't abandoned "progressive" for this label yet...I mean, if Democrats took their name and applied it to "vile" not only would they free up energy they would otherwise use trying to hide that they're not, but instead of ruining the meaning of words they may actually rehab one for once.
People hunger for honesty in politics, Democrats have a golden opportunity here. If they took it sooner Anthony Weiner might still be a Congressman.Add a comment
During debate over "Cut Cap and Balance," and after breaking decorum by speaking ill of him after he left the room Allen West really let Debbie Wasserman Schultz have it. Here is the money shot...
You have proven repeatedly that you are not a Lady, therefore, shall not be afforded due respect from me!
See the entire email West launched at her at The Other McCain
What a speech! I think the only other place you would find more original thought is in plagiarism.
I've got to say, I'm not seeing a whole lot of quacking like a duck, "she" sounds like Kermit the Frog on testosterone therapy, and is even dressed like Kermit! Also, "she" was doing a lot of weird mouth twisting and eye movements like something was up her rear end controlling her movements.
I think Rep. West made a good call on this.Add a comment
Obama doesn't like being shouted at, because the sound waves rupture his thin skin. I don't see the use of shouting questions at him anyway. He's not hard of hearing, he's tone deaf.
Questions directed at him should address that more than anything...
Mr. President, how much of the strategic oil reserves you want released will go to gassing up Air Force One for the First Lady's vacations?
Would you consider Libya the mother of all sand traps?
We know the First Lady wants us to eat healthier so there can be more of the good stuff for her, but will you please assure your base there is no plan to regulate consumption of Kool-aid?
Were you for gay marriage before you were against it? Because that seems a lot like wrapping the scarf before popping the collar. So for clarity to the gay community, and to paraphrase Lady Gaga...you were born which way?
Are you only mad that Republicans predictably call your bluff because the Arab world does it so much?
Which parties do you want us to cover you attending to mark the default on U.S. debt?
Do Democrats shun wearing the Christian cross because they're vampires that suck on the blood of capitalism?
If you dumped Vice President Biden for a more competent appearing Andrew Cuomo wouldn't that constitute letting a crisis go to waste?
If polls show a generic Republican beating you, shouldn't your main election strategy be to just switch parties?
In any case, there's that and more from today's Newsbusted.