Yup, its true. His wife has a little Weiner in the oven...and that's how babies are made.
Somebody had to say it! :-)
Seriously though, way to rain on the parade of joy such news is supposed to bring, Anthony. Even writers of Spanish telenovelas aren't this cruel. At least it wont be yet another lie when he says he wants to spend more time with his family...I think...
Somebody...lawyer me...this twist just gave me whiplash.
I texted my wife the news, this is how the conversation went
Wife: Oh no, that's sad.
Me: Unbelievably bad timing.
Wife: There's never a good time to get knocked up by a DB.
You don't have to tell me how lucky I am to have her...I know. At least he cant impregnate the internet. Imagine all the anchor babies we'd have....hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.... :-/ ( that was a VERY bad html coding joke)Add a comment
Add a comment
USA Today has an article about the need for Obama to revive his brand for the 2012 election. He lost control of it.
I'm not quite sure what that means....
But he needs to find a way to trick people again, and being half way done with his first term, "change" ain't gonna do it for him, because he'd either be asking us to change from him, or asking us to fork over what's left of our money to him.
This was inevitable. The entire campaign was built on a bill of goods, and while conservatives knew back then his rhetoric couldn't deliver results (back then = Karl Marx's birthday) the "no-news junkies" in this joint we call America are starting to figure it out.
If Obama needs a rebrand that will reenergize the country after he powered them in 2009 with a half dead battery, then I have a modest proposall that he goes with what has truly always worked...sex.
It works because in the end he's really selling a lifestyle, and nothing makes wallowing in the left's fecal politics more appealing than naked chicks who dig it.
Does PETA send in the army of unshaven, birkenstock-clad, foot soldiers when they want people to crave vegan food? No! They send in the hot naked chicks to convince people that delicious A1 should really be nothing more than a BINGO square at the Biden household.
Sex works. No other brand will get you the recognition you need better. Think about how until last week only hard-core political junkies and his constituents knew who Anthony Weiner was. Now the question on the lips of the formerly ignorant isn't who he is, but why the news media keeps forgetting to tell us his last name.
This could be a real coup for presidential politics. Instead of putting time, effort, and money into faking substance you could just send out girls who wear nothing except Obama 2012 stickers over their nipples
Ok, not her....
Really though, think about it....it makes sense. Just imagine all of the double entendre and/or innuendo-filled slogans that can fuel a campaign that breaks all the rules like it did in 2008....
Nobody whacks balls more...
I'm not calling at 3AM to give you hope.
Taking Responsibility: I like big BUTS and I cannot lie...
Who wants four more years of me hikin' taxes and bashin' Bush?
Havin' a 3-way with the Nanny and The State
The economy is giving me flacid flashbacks.
Your mom....I'd tax that.
From Capitalism to Communism: I'll take America to Viagra Falls
Ask your psychiatrist if you suffered from Premature Immaculatation.
Sure these slogans are more honest than they are flattering, but thats ok because sex clouds our ability to judge anyway. If it didn't we'd be saying "former" Congressman Weiner by now.Add a comment
The major reason conservatives can claim the moral high ground on these kinds of scandals is that we do not defend the offenders. On the other hand liberals, come hell or high water, will defend their guys to the death. Not even a confession breaks their focus.
That's why Assony Weiner refuses to resign. He won't have to because the Democrats use a moral compass points south, and I don't mean Mexico.
They stood by Bill Clinton, and they were wrong there too. This got me to realize that the comparisons between the two scandals are pretty amazing, but who did theirs better?
It looks like Weiner edges out the former president by
a nose his wiener! I know, it's not really a death match, unless the death referred to is the greatness of America as a reflection of it's "leadership."
Last week I did a post on why this matters. In it I mentioned the legion of liberals defending this guy when he wouldn't even exonerate himself.
As if the blogosphere wasn't enough, Rachel Maddow devoted a segment of her show to floating all the ways Weiner could be innocent...WHILE HE REFUSED TO PROCLAIM IT HIMSELF!
What on earth do you have to say for yourselves now liberals? I don't ask that to gloat, I ask because there was no question whatsoever he did this, and at the risk of sounding like a broken record, he willfully refused to clear himself. So how proud are you all of your defending him now?
That said, I'm sure not all libs are in denial...
Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy!
Thanks for the toon iOwnTheWorld.
Now Pelosi wants to see an ethics investigation. Thats interesting since DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz wants to excuse it.....Sounds to me like Nancy might be a woman scorned! ;-D
The rat should, in no uncertain terms, resign, if this investigation is the "A" to that "B" then go for it Nancy.Add a comment
San Francisco wants to vote on banning circumcisions of baby boys/anything birthed by Rosie O'Donnell, and now interest in it is spreading across the country...apparently...
(Matthew "I really really REALLY need a life") Hess has created similar legislation for states across the country, but those measures never had much traction. Now he is fielding calls from people who want to organize similar movements in their cities.
“This is a conversation we are long overdue to have in this country,” he said. “The end goal for us is making cutting boys’ foreskin a federal crime.”
See the full story here
Don't let the NYT article fool you, this guy has followers that number in the HUNDREDS on Facebook and Twitter. So I guess it's a major victory for what he calls "intactivism" that he managed to get a sensible place like San Francisco to finally hold a vote on what he calls "genital mutilation."
Considering my assumption that the city's namesake, Mr. Francisco, means he must be the patron saint of ass backwards (pun intended), I don't know if this is a victory for this looney toon so much as the people there finally got to that item on their fringe-to-do list.
I wonder if the bill will make exceptions for people who piss them off, for example, real "intactivists" we know and love as "pro-lifers." Far be it for the foreskin lobby to prevent the most tolerant people in the world from tearing into people who disagree with them like Christmas gift wrap.
It would be super awesome if people like Hess took even half of the energy they devote to making a medical procedure that spans millenia first cousins with crimes like kidnapping, and devote it to real childrens rights, like the right to live in the first place.
How does one find a calling like this? Was making manager at McDonalds too high of a bar for someone like Hess? Did some acid trip inspire the idea that smegma could cure cancer if only there was enough of it?
Honestly libs, this is progressive? We've progressed so far that the only crusade left to fight is the war on foreskin? What happened to "keep your laws off my body?"
If San Francisco votes this into law, this would be the perfect opportunity to revise that slogan, for the sake of clarity, to "keep your laws off my infanticidal cravings."
There's always silver lining to a liberal crap sandwich, isn't there?
***UPDATE***Add a comment
When being pushed to explain how the commerce clause adequately addresses ObamaCare's individual mandate before a federal appeals panel of judges this is what the spark plug that resides in the acting Soliciter General's brain struggled to come up with.
"If we're going to play that game, I think that game can be played here as well, because after all, the minimum coverage provision only kicks in after people have earned a minimum amount of income," Kaytal said. "So it's a penalty on earning a certain amount of income and self insuring. It's not just on self insuring on its own. So I guess one could say... someone doesn't need to earn that much income. I think both are kind of fanciful and I think get at…"
More at The Washington Examiner
Wow, what a great idea. I never thought of it that way, but it's so obvious! If you don't want to be on the hook for the governnment goodies all you have to do is strive for mediocrity. Why would Democrats want us to do that?
They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor. If they need more voters, then they have to make more of who they are for.
What a great backdoor solution to destroying leftist ideology once and for all. Their idiotic nonsense could collapse on its own weight because nobody wants to make enough money to actually fund any of it. The best part is they're suggesting it!
Well, I have a better idea. Instead forcing the rest of us to make less money why don't Marxist a-holes who don't want to endure the "penalty" of living in a country where people would rather take care of themselves do us all a favor and "opt out" of America.
The world is a smorgasbord of misery laced poop for them to roll around in, stay the hell out of our living room.Add a comment
Rush Limbaugh spoke this morning of how he'd rather beat liberals on their ideas over opportunistic scandal. He's both right and wrong about this. Through all the jokes that are being cracked there is, in fact, an idea that should be battled over in this scandal. In politics it's actually the most important idea of them all.
The world is going to hell, and so the attention we have been giving Weinergate, I know, seems disproportionate. The left grasps at straws in their defense of him, and the right wants him to stop acting so damn guilty and just admit it already. Seriously, at this point I was less sure about OJ's guilt.
Meanwhile, blogs like The Moderate Voice think the only apology Weiner owes for this mess is to his wife alone.
Too many of us still don't get that CHARACTER MATTERS! It matters that Anthony Weiner took a roll of dimes, stuffed it in his boxer briefs, and tweeeted it to a college girl, he has supposedly never met, clear across the country....why does this matter?
BECAUSE the world IS going to HELL, AND WE NEED LEADERS WHO CAN NAVIGATE US OUT OF IT....Therefore CHARACTER MATTERS!!!
(From The Moderate Voice) Weiner's credibility hangs in that balance, as does his reputation, but neither means he can't do his job...
Republican DB Christopher Lee resigned for taking us to his own private gun show. No conservative had that guy's back, because CHARACTER MATTERS. Yeah, we can see his face, and the only thing higher than the certainty it's him is the tax rate liberals wish they could impose. So there is no way his career could avoid being KIA.
Twelve years after Newt Gingrich committed marital strike two, liberals and conservatives alike say that alone disqualifies him from ever receiving their vote for president.
This is why conservatives almost never defend each other when they step into their own personal Weinergate. CHARACTER MATTERS.
What we're getting from Weiner and his liberal namesakes in the media is oh so much worse. While he's playing word games, or neither confirming nor denying that picture is him, or being unsure it's not him (HE DOESN'T FREAKING KNOW?!?), the liberal blogosphere is feverishly trying to exonerate a man who himself, at the time of this writing, refuses to unequivocally proclaim his innocence.
Anthony showed us the beef....but where is the left's CHARACTER?!? Mr. Magoo would have an easier time finding Waldo buried under a pile of American flags....
Being an elected official is a privilege. Ostensibly, it is bestowed upon people who have earned, and deserve to be trusted with, the power to handle some of the most challenging problems that face the country/state/municipality they have been charged to uphold and defend. Their existing on a higher moral plane isn't something that sounds like a nice idea, it is expected. In reality, it should be demanded regardless of whether you've even proven your worth. Period.
A minimum standard of measurement for character should be the person's family. If Anthony Weiner can't be trustworthy to his own wife, why the hell should anyone trust him with their taxes? Or national security? Or not inducing vomit all over my smart phone?
How can anyone act with unimpeachable character in the interests of the public when they can't even do the same for the people they say they love?Add a comment