Reid worried his "but for me we'd be in a world-wide depression" statement has been grossly misinterpreted by gay community
Voters gear up to show Democrats that the stimulus did in fact produce shovel ready projects
Sharron Angle leaves Nevada voters confused after urging them to vote for the "only real woman" running for Senator.
GOP reassures NPR they don't want to "defund" the network, they just want to change its funding to one dollar per listener.Add a comment
In case you missed it...
WOW! Somebody get this guy a cape and an alter ego. Maybe Barack and Nancy can do that since the stimulus was apparently a one-man show. This begs the question, what else what else would we have, but for Harry Reid?......
We'd have one less exception to "'i' before 'e' except after 'c'".
We'd be able to say "Mormons are actually really awesome...but for Harry Reid."
The average pitch of the human male would be 30% lower
We'd have one less narcissist in the senate who thinks their reflection should be the tie breaking vote.
We'd have a chance in hell that bifocals could become cool
We'd have a senator that support the troops better than the jock strap he wears as a gender diversion
Lost jobs would be bad unless it was his.
Obama's "negro dialect" would be known as his "voice."
Searchlight wouldn't have to claim such a dimwit.
Sharon Angle would be the most feminine person in the race.
Did I miss anything?Add a comment
Discovery of water on the moon renews hope that science will one day find life in Biden's head
NPR CEO denounces Juan Williams's statement about Muslims on planes, adds she's not bigoted enough to examine who she flies with on her private jet
Al Queda issues statement of concern that Williams's firing by NPR is a sign they are not being taken seriously enough
Biden calls on Pelosi to join him in his idea to convince GOP voters to vote Democrat by re-registering Republican.Add a comment
As if it wasn't enough for the harpies on The View to live in denial about the nature of our attacker when Bill O'Reilly was willing to confront them with it. NPR has now fired Juan Williams for this...
Can anyone at NPR say with a straight face that they have no idea what Juan is talking about? Their awareness of who flies on a plane with them hasn't been heightened at all since 9-11?
I think its time to rename National Public Radio, because I don't know what public they think they're serving, but its not the American one...
Prodigies at being
Proven to be
Help me out here people, give me your ideas!Add a comment
My hatred of the French has always been something that was relatively intangible...until now....
Battling for benefits is a tradition in the Gilly family, passed from generation to generation — as it is for families across the country. And that goes some way toward explaining why the protests against plans to raise France's retirement age have shown such determination and ferocity.
For Gilly and many other Frenchmen and women, social benefits such as long vacations, state-subsidized health care and early retirement are more than just luxuries: They're seen as a birthright — an essential part of the identity of today's France.
The protest against a government plan to raise the retirement age to 62 has special meaning for five members of the Eric Gilly clan who are demonstrating in the streets of Marseille.
"We want to stop working at 60 because it's something our parents, our grandparents and even our great-grandparents fought for," says Gilly, 50, a union representative at Saint-Pierre Cemetery, the largest in this bustling Mediterranean port city.
"And over the years ... you can see that we're losing everything they fought for. And that's unacceptable."
Read the rest of French strike to save 'birthright' of privileges here.
Every election since 9-11 has been billed as the most important election of our lifetime to the point of it sounding almost cliche....almost. The truth is it's true everytime it's said because every time it comes to vote the sense that our societal stability is in jeopardy becomes more dire.
Europe is like the trapped action hero whose arch nemesis, Socialist Sam (Uncle Sam's evil fraternal twin brother, who I envision to have Karl Marx's intellect and Pelosi's dashing good looks), is explaining the elaborate gruesome death that awaits them, and liberals in America are begging for us to be allowed to go next.
The French are wimps, pansies, and wimpy pansies. We've known this forever. The toughest guy they could produce, Napoleon Bonaparte, was so small he could've been Tinkerbell's stunt double.
I also maintain the theory that they only have nukes so they can better toast the only weapon of
mass destruction they ever intend to use...French toast...
The real mystery remains is whether or not its in their DNA, or is it socialism that has made them softer than their cheese.
In any case, according to 50 year old Eric Gilly retiring at 60 is a birthright...a birthright?!?
(from the AP article) It was in 1982, under Socialist President Francois Mitterrand, that the minimum age to stop working was lowered from 65 to 60. The measure, emblematic of the 14-year Mitterrand presidency, was adopted by a special ordinance that bypassed parliament.
Gilly Silly was 22 when this "birthright" was bestowed upon him. If that doesn't make things clear enough how about this...he was in his 88th trimester when he was told that he could spend ALL of his sixties thinking about who would be the next to invade France WITHOUT the distraction of having a job.
Note the way Mitterrand had to "bypass" parliament to get it done. Remember how "deem and pass" was going to be the way Pelosi was going to pass ObamaCare before she was able to make Bart Stupak the dumbest member of Congress east of San Francisco?
This is where liberals in America ultimately want to take us. THIS ALSO is the most important election ever. Since FDR we have been inching to this point, and the current leadership of the left slapped on the rocket boosters. It has been understood by pretty much all of conservative punditry that this is it...this election is the line in the sand because the next step takes us over the cliff and into freefall.
Liberals, "progressives," socialists, whatever you want to call them, are so self-absorbed and obsessed with creating a culture of dependence that will serve as their power battery that they don't care about the imminent fiscal catastrophe that faces us. The world economy is a car, and America has been that car's engine. Liberals in France have made them the passenger side ashtray.
Liberals want to turn America into the world's driver side ashtray! Yes, the GOP screwed up pretty bad to get us to this point where the country wanted to elect people who think Uncle Sam would prefer to masticate cigarette poop. No matter how incompetent they are nobody can say the GOP wants that.
That's ultimately what this next election is about....Republican vs. Democrat....conservative vs. liberal....engine vs. ashtray.
P.S. I don't think the first lady, BY ANY MEANS, is fat. It is said that you roast the ones you love, I'll let you know as soon as I do the proper justification for roasting her.Add a comment
After a 4 month break I'm going to bring the satire headlines back! I know I know, you're all super excited!!!!
It's going to be a little different from before. I'll package them into little posts instead of tweets and status updates (I'm only going to do that for my favorites). Before I would do 1-2 per day, but I'm going to shoot for 3-5 a day.
Rove tells Der Spiegel Obama is an "utter disaster," Biden fires back "Dammit Karl he's a president not a dairy farmer!"
Sarkozy now worried conflict in France over lifting retirement age may be never-ending as white flag makers join strikes
9th Circuit stays overturn of Don't Ask Don't Tell policy over emerging interest in transferring the policy from "gays serving" to "terrorist rules of engagement."
Obama cancels trip to Sikh temple during trip to India, being reassured that Sikhs are not Muslim the president replied, "exactly."
Pelosi swears off botox to prove point that things can indeed go lower than her latest approval rating.Add a comment
Apparently this picture is a bit old, but I just found it and its too good to not comment on!
They say a picture says a thousand words...lets see if I can find a few of 'em....
Michelle MADE me paint it blue...and she said that I can't buy pink bikes ever again :-(
I stopped letting Barney borrow it because he forgets to put the seat back on.
For Joe's birthday I slapped some chicken wings on it, gave it to him and called it Air Force 2.
I wanted to get a basket for Bo, but there's not enough room for him and my ego.
Even though I took off the flame stickers I still think this helmet makes me look too macho...
I call the tires hope and change because they constantly go flat.
The shoes and helmet match the bike, and gay people still give me crap?!?
So how awesome are these training wheels?!?
This would be a lot easier to ride if Michelle let me wear my bike shorts instead of her "gardening" jeans...
I can't talk about government spending while riding this thing...for some reason the breaks stop working...
This seat would be really uncomfortable if I had balls...
The sunglasses make me look bad ass, but shouldn't I be wearing safety goggles?
Al Gore would be pissed because Michelle's cooking makes this a high emissions vehicle...
Alright guys, show me what you got!
O>;-)Add a comment
My "editorial" comments will be embedded into news articles in yellow.
A House Democratic lawmaker said late last week that he'd heard Nancy Pelosi wouldn't seek another term as Speaker. Dems are losing the house so it doesn't matter
Rep. Mike McIntyre (D-N.C.) said that not only would he not back Pelosi (D-Calif.) for Speaker again, but also that he'd heard she would not seek another term in that position. I said it doesn't matter, the minority doesn't get the position
"From what we're hearing, she's probably not going to run for Speaker again," McIntyre told WWAY-TV in North Carolina. "And if she does, I'm confident she's going to have opposition, and I look forward to supporting that opposition." ARE YOU PEOPLE @#@#!#$ RETARDED!?!
Read the rest at The Hill...if you must
Do you see what this is?!? Its as if the Democrats don't realize they're about to win the silver medal in a two man race.
Why is this a story? Are these flying monkey's trying to start a rumor that will encourage independents to give them another shot because they're finally going to reject that botox addled harpy they call a leader?
Its almost here people....We're going to pry that gavel from her cold, dead, hands...and then we're going to allow her to plant her ass in the cheap seats with her parting gift from the GOP (a flask filled with formaldehyde) so she can preserve herself long enough to end her career with what's left of the Democratic peons that were decimated by her tactics.Add a comment
For rebuttal, this calls for me to bring back a piece from last month...because it bears repeating...
(To see the little stuff you can view the full res version by clicking the image)
Love the scratchy voice Barack, seriously. It reminds me of the Scooby Doo show...Shaggy sounded the same way when he was really scared.
Add a comment
The Ten Cannots (via Wikipedia)
Pass it on....
(This was originally posted at iOwnTheWorld<---click here and visit them now!)Add a comment
Sarah Palin wisely warned Tea Party activists to keep working hard right up until Election Day — and not to “party like it’s 1773″ yet.
Intellectually superior leftists from Daily Kos founder Markos Moulitsas to PBS “moderator”/Obama cheerleader Gwen Ifill took to Twitter to snicker about Palin’s historical illiteracy.
But it’s the Palin-bashers who humiliated themselves, via Cuffy Meigs.
Check out more at Perfunction
I think these morons party like its 1973...thats why they think like their brains have VD.Add a comment
New deal I'm going to try out...editorial comments by me will be embedded into news articles in yellow. Starting with this article from the LA Times...
Sarah Palin, that reputed Republican rebel who's supposed to be at odds with the national party When the hell did this happen? Is this what liberals' Ouija boards them?, swung through California this past weekend to rouse Republicans at a Republican National Committee rally in Anaheim...
...(at the rally) Palin said, please, nobody should tell the Democratic president what number comes after a trillion. (It's quadrillion.) Oooh goody the LA Times can use Google Obama will bring Air Force One back to California later this month to help incumbent Sen. Barbara Boxer so she doesn't have to go back to being called "Ma'am" in her effort to avoid all things feminine except being registered Democrat against Republican Carly Fiorina -- and drop into Nevada again to do the same for embattled Harry Reid vs the GOP's Sharron Angle because nothing says re-elect like an endorsement from dope and derange.Read the entire column from the LA Times here
This shows the clear bias the LA Times has FOR the president. She specifically asked that nobody tell him and they did it anyway.
I don't know, maybe they were just trying to brag that they know because thats about how many times the media tries to make us choke down the liberal line a day.
Part of me thinks its as if they were suggesting SHE didn't know. What if she doesn't know? What would that mean?
Basically President (Republican name here) can't count to quadrillion, so they won't spend that much.
Add a comment
I have to admit, some of these are a bit salty, but I never set out to make this site for kids...
If it feels like going from GOP to Democrat rule is like going from tax cuts to tax sluts...
If you think the Democrats changed their logo to a "D" so Biden knows who to root for while watching TV on election night...
If you thought handout was just a move from the hokey pokey until the Dems took over...
If you think taxes, regulation, and an Uncle Sam blowup doll are all you need to make a Democrat snuff film...
If you think Nancy Pelosi is kinda hot for a bride of Frankenstein...
If you think Harry Reid modifies his voice to sound more masculine than he is...
If you suspect monkeys have a saying that goes something like "that's so easy Robert Gibbs could do it"...
If Meghan McCain only makes you feel horny because she is such a RINO...
If you suspect that Alan Grayson's last name is short for Graysonovabitch...
If you think watching MSNBC constitutes charitable giving that should be tax deductible...
If you'd call a gathering of Dems for an Obama bill signing an "Uncle Sam gang bang"...
If you thought food stamps was postage made out of food...
If you know a lot about creating jobs and nothing about giving them...
If you hear Nancy Pelosi say on a summer day "I'm melting" and you're hoping someone finally threw a bucket of water on her...
If you think tax day is only in April so the IRS can do spring cleaning on your bank account....
If you'd bet global warming would feel a lot more real if Al Gore would just fire up the heaters in all his mansions to full blast for a few minutes...
You might be conservative!Add a comment
In 2000 the senate was split 50-50, leading to an arrangement that would have the GOP "sharing power" with the Democrats, not unlike sharing a prime rib dinner with a grizzly bear...
In 2001 newly re-elected Vermont Republican Jim Jeffords's testicles crawled back up inside him because the air in Vermont is really cold and Al Gore hadn't made global warming hip and trendy yet so he couldn't lie to himself about how warm he was. Since he no longer had a pair he had to become an independent, and this gave control of the Senate to the Democrats...
In 2002 the GOP took back control of the Senate and gains were made in the House because voters figured out that if someone wants to go to war with America then Americans should probably be in charge of the country...
In 2006 voters were given the choice between Democrats and a bunch of wieners dressed like Democrats, and they chose the Democrats.
And as they say...the rest is history.......who came up with that saying? It sounds like something Biden would invent
My calculations show that the Republican Party, during the Bush presidency, was in total control of the government for about 4 years.
Why does this matter? Maybe I'm crazy, but I think an important tool in "fixing" the economy should be a basic understanding of math...
The fact is that this White House and the Democrats in Congress have been focusing on jobs. To focus on jobs, you have to fix the economy first, which the Democrats did. And as important, Democrats have tried to focus on those who have been hurt from eight years of neglect. What does that mean?
It means 16 different tax breaks and supports for small business owners, who were neglected by the Republicans for eight years.
It means making student loans more affordable by cutting middleman subsidies, which had been growing for eight years.
It means passing a patient's bill of rights to control insurance costs, which have been growing for eight years.
It means investing in solar and electric cars and alternative energy, which has been neglected for eight years.
Then, it means curtailing deceptive banking practices, which have been getting worse and screwing consumers for eight years.
And it means providing tax breaks for middle-class Americans, who have been squeezed for eight years.
If you like reading Democrat diatribes that make your nose bleed you can read the rest of Hilary Rosen's Obama is fixing GOP's economic mess<---here
Nevermind the "Duh"NC talking points that don't actually say anything real, much less prove any point. This illustrates the perpetual droning that all Dems want to say "we got screwed for 8 years by the GOP" when they were in control of Congress for almost half of it.
No wonder the economy continues to tank under their leadership, how can these morons count money when they can't even count years?Add a comment
Ezra Klein from the Washington Post recently wrote a column about the irrelevance of liberalism's lack of a brand...
There is perhaps no surer signal that Democrats are about to suffer a terrific defeat than to see liberals begin discussing how to define, redefine, or otherwise burnish their "brand." So far as I'm concerned, this falls firmly in the "doesn't matter" category of American politics. In 2004, all liberals could talk about was the power of the conservative brand, and George Lakoff became an icon because of it. In 2006 and 2008, better branding didn't save Republicans from being devastated in the polls, leading Democrats to the first 60-vote Senate majority since the 1970s. So much for brands....Read the entire column here<--- (via Memeorandum)
Why am I blogging about this? Klein's analysis, like so many other liberal columns, is so irritatingly shallow a shot glass could be mistaken for the Pacific Ocean. Since he is a liberal himself I can't blame him for trying rationalize why the liberal brand is "doesn't matter," but his analysis must have come from an essay written by a 5th grader.
Klein concludes that while the country has always considered itself to be more conservative, especially in polling data, the lurching to the left that has taken place since the 30's by the liberal politicians we elect somehow put truth to the lie that we actually like liberalism and just don't know it because conservatives better brand themselves.
First off, the points of reference he uses point to the liberalism of yesteryear, especially at the end when he goes all the way back to 1936, BEFORE the Democratic Party left Ronald Reagan. If the Democrats of that time were to hear just 5 minutes of Obama, or any modern day liberal, giving a speech on anything they would be left bemused and wondering where they came from and why their accents sound so American.
Second, people are willing to apply the conservative label to themselves because they know the brand is something American, it's that specific. They don't gag when they see our flag, they support our troops WHEN they're fighting, and they believe Biden makes them feel like they can be VP too. They feel its something they can believe in, like their parents before them.
Lastly, liberals do have an identity, they just never have the guts to tell us about it because they know we would never dream of voting for them if we actually knew what they we were getting. That's why the number of people who would re-elect Obama currently hovers in the 30's, we're not interested in becoming repeat customers of the Enron of presidents.
By the way, liberalism only prevails at the polls when conservatism gets afflicted with the political version of mad cow disease. In the real world when cows get sick chicken farmers hit the jackpot. Its the same for liberals, everyone prefers a good burger, but we'll settle for chicken until the cows clean up their act....or until people get tired of the chickens spending all of our money, and offering themselves up for dinner to the countries that don't eat pork and beef, and telling us we're too dumb to cross the road without their help.
Be honest, does anyone have a solid idea of what Democrats actually campaigned FOR in 2006 and 2008.......other than being chickens who are impervious to mad cow disease?
Voters only elect Democrats when conservatives forget they're supposed to be accountable to them. That's when liberals get to skate by without having to talk about all the things that make them lay their rotten eggs...raising taxes, picking activist judges to undermine the constitution, and playing catcher (I'm not talking baseball) for the rest of the world, especially for the nations that hate us.
Do you get it? The entire left wing of the American political spectrum is just one big honkin' ball of opportunistic deceit that doesn't let crises go to waste. We get fooled into handing them the keys to the castle, they trash it like the rock stars they think they are, and then when they finally get tossed out the newly elected conservatives, for whatever reason, do little to nothing to reverse the damage.
Then we get towering pillars of intellect like Ezra Klein, concluding that the country actually loves the crap sandwich that they told us was fillet mignon.
Klein should have waited a month to write the column. The election would've shown him that he needed to conserve his energy so he could write about something that would make him sound a little more intelligent. He could start with "why liberalism is rejected when voters become aware of it."Add a comment